Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:49:44 +0100: > I'm not sure if some more protection is needed: Any change done > through this page can just as easily been undone through succeeding > edits. For example "Branch closure" could be hidden if the branch is > "trunk", the "new branch named:" field is not filled and "trunk" had > only a single leaf.
Let me know what you think of the recent change I made which attempts to add some protection. Not sure if it is complete---I've done little Javascript to date so perhaps someone with more Javascript experience could pick it apart if necessary: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/11e8a48e4d Is this even something we want? Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000052a036ff _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
