On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:17:47PM -0500, James Turner wrote: [snip]
> I'll check with others but I'm not sure reliability is really the > concern. We imported SQLite into our base tree. Because of this we try, > when possible, to limit duplicating libraries in ports to reduce having > to patch multiple versions of the same libraries. > > A good example of this is Firefox and newer software that uses WebKit. > These projects like to ship their own copies of libraries to make their > building process easier. For us, it just increases our headaches when > it comes to maintaining required patches. > > SQLite is clearly a different case. I believe the only major patch we > have in our tree relates to adding arc4random(3) support. If fossil > removes --disable-internal-sqlite I highly doubt I'll be asked to > maintain this feature in our ports tree (again I'll check with others > and get back with you). > > -- > James Turner I didn't get a strong outcry from other OpenBSD porters. We understand embedding SQLite is the typical way it's used and therefor somewhat of a different case. We would prefer --disable-internal-sqlite to remain but again you are the maintainers and of course must make the final decision. -- James Turner _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
