On 2/17/14, 5:33 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
[...]
> - rather than think in terms of pages i'd like to think in terms of "apps"
> or "applets." There's no reason that a "page" should not be able to turn
> around and embed 4 other smaller "pagelets." There's also no reason those
> pagelets can't load JavaScript, fetch JSON data from the server, and be
> completely interactive.

This sounds very much as if what you're actually looking for is a web
servlet engine with libfossil bindings, rather than anything that's
actually specific to Fossil.

In which case I'd strongly urge that the best option here is to pick a
third party servlet engine based on its own criteria rather than
inventing yet another one --- they're harder than they look and there
are too many as it is! (Particularly if you want something
session-based; sessions are surprisingly hard to get right.)

[...]
> In your opinion, what page is missing from Fossil, which you would like to
> see (keeping in mind the caveats mentioned above)?

I'd like a page that allows browsing the repository *by filename*. There
are many occasions when I want to be able to link directly to the tip
version of a particular file, and currently I can't do that --- I either
have to link to a file by artifact ID or force the file to be available
via doc/ somehow, which isn't always possible.

-- 
┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│
│ "You cannot truly appreciate _Atlas Shrugged_ until you have read it
│ in the original Klingon." --- Sea Wasp on r.a.sf.w

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to