I was wrong. See http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/ebb0
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Baruch Burstein <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Andy Goth <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >>> and allows you to search for commits by prefix. IOW the prefix thing >>> is a pure convenience to reduce the amount of stuff to enter. >>> >> >> Understood, but this convenience feature feeds back into the database >> when the user enters a prefix into a commit comment or a ticket or a >> wiki page. >> > > I would assume that a non-unique prefix should resolve to the earlier of > the two. That would solve this problem, since older tickets etc. would > continue to refer to the same commit/artifact as they did originally. I > don't know if this is what actually happens, though. > > > > -- > ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı > -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
