On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Matt Welland <estifo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So you are recommending we abandon fossil because of this? Storing the > files on local disk is not an option for us. Also, other than being a > little slow, storing fossils on NFS has not been an issue. > Search this page for "NFS": http://sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html > I did some more testing and this is unique to using ssh and it occurs on > local disk just as fast as on NFS. > Then you're lucky. > Anyone sharing fossils using ssh will run into this sooner or later. This > is using 1.28 > SSH is not the problem - NFS is historically problematic when it comes to file locking. i've seen apps slow down by a factor of a hundred when using locking over NFS, and heard/read many horror stories of shared file corruption over buggy NFSes. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
