On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Andreas Kupries <andre...@activestate.com> > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if the rebuild will also redo the cluster artifacts. > > > i have no idea - i'm not at all familiar with the sync-related code (because > it's way down on the list of libfossil's TODOs ;). >> If these are done wrongly, it may very well cause the receiver to >> believe that it has stuff which it doesn't. > > > It's a starting point, which is more than we've had so far :/.
Another would be to see what the --verily is doing differently from regular sync. For ex. does it bypass the cluster optimizations ? I.e. any code bypassed by --verily would be suspect -- Andreas Kupries Senior Tcl Developer Code to Cloud: Smarter, Safer, Faster(tm) F: 778.786.1133 andre...@activestate.com http://www.activestate.com Learn about Stackato for Private PaaS: http://www.activestate.com/stackato EuroTcl'2014, July 12-13, Munich, GER -- http://www.eurotcl.tcl3d.org/ 21'st Tcl/Tk Conference: Nov 10-14, Portland, OR, USA -- http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2014/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
