On Fri, 09 May 2014 21:07:59 +0200, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:02 PM, j. van den hoff
<veedeeh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2014 20:42:06 +0200, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
IMO. (That said, i never was a big fan of having symlink support in
fossil!)
well, the possibility to do that symlink trick for tracking config files
all over the place
might be handy for some.
That's what has always bothered me about the symlinks support: it's
inherently non-portable, opens up tricky questions about how it "should"
behave, and it "might be handy for some" (it's not generally needed -
again agreed. but it does no harm to have it (as long as one does not
demand too much
of it).
i've
never used it, and never missed it). i do, however, agree that (like
diff-follows-rename) if you have a need for it, it's a handy feature to
the diff-follows-rename problem seems in a different league for me. and
the "how it should behave" issue has a clear answer in this case (at least
there would be a clear majority vote ;-))
have.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
