On 29 May 2014 20:40, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> ... >> >> What would work is choose something other than 'fossil sync' to >> backup, encrypt repos locally and then transfer them, but some of >> these are fairly large (~ 1 GB) and have small but frequent changes, >> which would probably result in a very different encrypted repo-file. > > Large sections of the repository file likely remain unchanged, even with > frequent updates. (Running "fossil rebuild" is a different story, of > course.) So you should be able to encrypt a copy of the repo locally, then > rsync it to the remote location.
Ok, that's worth a try and probably the simplest, thanks. I was thinking the resulting encrypted repo would change a lot, when only certain blocks in the unencrypted repo change. Would this not be so? Michai _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
