I was going to +1 sbeals idea, but the pull-only autosync note came up, and now I think I may not know all there is about autosync. Thanks for keeping it interesting, folks. On May 29, 2014 8:34 PM, "Andy Bradford" <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 29 May 2014 22:10:24 +0200: > > > Wasn't even aware of pull-only until earlier today. i am completely > > ambivalent on the topic - never had any problems with autosync - this > > was just what came to mind when you posted. Seemed easier than adding > > a new option, but was not aware of the pull-only feature (so a second > > option might be simpler). > > Actually, I thought it was a great idea except that it conflicted with > pull-only. I agree that it will be simpler as a separate setting: > > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/7653ab63420e4ab4ca6372a53de9314a18e1b946 > > It will default to 1 so it retains the same behavior as Fossil without > the setting. Setting it greater than 1 allows those who want Fossil to > try harder to get more tries. Autosync (on/off) itself is still governed > by the autosync setting. > > Andy > -- > TAI64 timestamp: 400000005387fc6d > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
