On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>
wrote:

> Looks  like this  is due  to the  recent addition  of the  empty initial
> checkin in [cac91b6cd17ab746]:
>

Can somebody please explain to me what this change accomplishes, other that
introduce needless bugs, which it seems to excel at?  What problem does it
solve?  Why shouldn't we back it out?



>
> $ fossil bisect bad
> bisect complete
>   2 BAD     2014-05-30 18:12:29 52d242a73be2d7d6
>   3 BAD     2014-05-24 06:27:01 a74d100a121219b8
>   4 BAD     2014-05-22 04:39:11 941ead2f9ad6f9ca
>   5 BAD     2014-05-19 09:56:31 c543079b87ce4b6c
>   6 BAD     2014-05-19 09:16:20 c060947196baef2d
>   7 BAD     2014-05-19 07:38:04 cac91b6cd17ab746
>   8 CURRENT 2014-05-19 07:38:04 cac91b6cd17ab746
>   1 GOOD    2014-05-14 16:05:34 ec44f61a831e4225
>
> It's easy  enough to  reproduce. Create  a new  empty repository.  Add 2
> files but only try to checkin 1 of them.
>
> Andy
> --
> TAI64 timestamp: 4000000053891f13
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to