At 28:18 drh suggests that key/value pair engines will not stand the test of time. Isn't sqlite4 going to be a key/value engine?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said B Harder on Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:42:39 -0700: > > > I think drh unnecessarily missed an opportunity there. He seemed to > > work harder to obfuscate what fossil actually was than giving a single > > passing description and moving on with his talk about SQL and using > > fossil by name where it's used as an example. > > He highlighted all the benefits that a SQLite backed Git might have and > then refered them to a live demo: > > http://www.sqlite.org/postgresql > > Without knowing the audience I would think this should be sufficient > advertising. > > Andy > -- > TAI64 timestamp: 40000000538c1337 > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
