On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Jan Nijtmans <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Just my 2c. Since fossil depends on SQLite for its date
> functions, I think this is intentional. See:
>     <http://www.sqlite.org/lang_datefunc.html>
>

As a side-note: the /reports pages use Week #0 in some cases... because
sqlite3 does it that way.


> The general rule should be: be generous in what you accept,
> strict in what you generate.


With the caveat that if sqlite3 generates it, then it's automatically OK ;).


> This means that fossil should never
> generate an hour value of 24, but accepting it during
> parsing should be no harm.


+1

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
"Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to