On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> actually... "it happened again", and the reason was simply me > forgetting the '-R' option for 'remote-url': e.g. typing "fossil > remote-url /the/local/repo.fossil" instead of "fossil remote-url -R > /the/local/repo.fossil". That will set a remote-url of the form > 'file:///'. > > I think I have a reasonable feel for what is, should be, and should > not be implemented w.r.t. fool-proofness in fossil by now; I am > guessing the above is too silly to implement a check for. Or not? > i've been thinking a lot about this and... i don't know what the "principle of least surprise" calls for here. i've never used remote-url before. Anyone else is of course welcomed to opine... -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
