On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Andy Goth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=92c2c1e5e18b19c5b05ea5684feb0bbeeb6670fd > > What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is > displayed as if on a branch. Was there a fork or something? > The only difference I can see is that that commit is marked "closed", so I suspect that's why it is considered a "branch". If closed were removed from it it'd probably be on the main trunk chart, but ... I'm really just guessing. SDR
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
