0.02$ never really understood why people feel they need private branches. A little public humility once in a while helps make us better developers ☺
----- stephan Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity and typos. On Jul 14, 2014 6:40 PM, "Gour" <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > Hello, > > the topic was already discussed several times in this mailing list, but > I wonder what is the obstacle for Fossil to provide ability to > shun/forge single branch(es), iow. whether it because it is, somehow, > against Fossil's design or there are some implementation-wise reasons? > > I've started my exploration of DVCS terrain with darcs many years ago > and tried (almost) all DVCS-es (darcs, bazaar, hg, mtn, git, fossil) and > lastly (mostly) using Git liking its light-branching features. > > Fossil is also very light when it comes to branching, so I'd like to > take advantage of its private branches - sometimes there is simply > useful to experiment with some work in private and then merge and/or > dispose later, but the current feature allows only to "remove all > private branches from a repository..." with the "fossil scrub > --private", but, imho, ability to purge single branch from the repo > would make the branching mechanism even more smooth. > > Any thought? > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the > fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities. > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
