-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/16/2014 11:33 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 7/14/2014 9:54 PM, Andy Goth wrote: >> When a file has been modified, [fossil diff -brief] reports it >> as CHANGED, whereas [fossil status] reports it as EDITED. Is >> this inconsistent terminology intentional? What other >> inconsistencies are possible between these two commands? I would >> have thought they'd share the same reporting code. > > I see [fossil changes] also says EDITED. Looks like [fossil diff > -brief] is the odd man out.
Furthermore, I see [fossil changes] and [fossil status] respect the relative paths setting, as discussed in a previous email "Inconsistent paths" replied to by Jan Nijtmans. However, [fossil diff] and [fossil diff -brief] do not honor relative paths. Once again, [fossil diff] is the odd man out, and I remain surprised it doesn't share the reporting code with the other two commands I mention. - -- Andy Goth | <andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTyEAXAAoJELtYwrrr47Y4UfIIAJqSOs8sNiIzudRITcHH8Td/ kLWBtUePwwCl87pI6kxV9gt6lL68gqvH53JiBlxvCd62HpEPnumxeEPTEwTXjjZF dLB7KjrgNFVq4k4JtsUcz1H2EV1Zs2Q4l1/f9U21HB5kcE6DgfBmAe3mlC/ZmyOl 3JnAwf6Dh9ljIHN/LszGWTTk90YgKCJgj2A0gPASYxtxKjuBXcleULvNqgfBLIoU II9yVTRxDavyQX7VV+Ii/Ebh8o/oR9F7WkURK7Cg/FEB1HG2noduFa5PGNKGBE/e DJJ1WcfGhOcXx5Zm1iqYg+HwbMQvEvxBzAY1dO4isqR3C8Fngr9QozQUywIau4E= =RP5D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
