On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Sean Woods <s...@seanwoods.com> wrote:
> What is the latest version of Fossil that will run on the 2.6.x line of > Linux kernels? Probably the tip of trunk. If "./configure" isn't working for you, then make a copy of Makefile.classic into "Makefile" and hand-edit that file to get it to do what you want. It isn't hard. The FuseFS support is only included if you add the -DFOSSIL_HAVE_FUSEFS compile-time option. So it is omitted by default in Makefile.classic. > I need this in order to run Fossil on my shared host. > See yesterday's conversation about filenames with a question mark in > them. Can't compile off trunk and I don't know why. > > Ideally someone (Stephan? :-D) would send me a pre-compiled fossil that > will work on 2.6; perhaps from some sort of archive of the Downloads > page. > > Failing that I have sudo access to another 2.6 box that I can use to > compile. > > The pre-compiled binary is for 3.x and the old binaries are no longer > there. > > Thoughts? > > P.S. What feature broke 2.6 compatibility? Was it FUSE integration? > Can I just turn a feature off at compile time? > > P.P.S. What arguments do you pass to configure to generate a static > binary? (./configure --help is unhelpful) > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
