On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
> I'm not aware of any evidence that an approve-up-front development process > gives better end results than a fix-in-place process. > Just to play Devil's Advocate (and not intended to diminish your thoughtful and detailed post): i'm fairly certain that space-going software pretty much has to be developed via up-front approval processes, as "reactive" methodologies are too late when you've got an 8-minute speed-of-light delay and you need to fix a Metric/English conversion bug which is about to cause your Mars Lander to smack into the planet's surface. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
