Thus said Abilio Marques on Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:14:09 -0430: > amarques@laptop-01 ~/tmp/resume $ fossil clone > ssh://abiliojr@raspberry1/.fossilrepos/resume.fossil > .resume.fossil > abiliojr@raspberry1's password: > Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 > Error: not authorized to clone > Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 > Clone finished with 569 bytes sent, 564 bytes received > server returned an error - clone aborted
This is perplexing. Will you rerun this clone using --sshtrace and --httptrace then provide the output? --sshstrace will simply alter the output of the clone. --httptrace will generate some .txt trace files in your current working directory beginning with http-request and http-reply. fossil clone --sshtrace --httptrace ssh://abiliojr@raspberry1/.fossilrepos/resume.fossil .resume.fossil The output for the SSH trace info can probably just be included in the reply, but if you have a really big repository, it might not be a good idea to include all the http-request/http-response files. If you can do it with a new repository that has no content that would be best and then you can just include them in the email. ssh abiliojr@raspberry1 ls -ld .fossilrepos .fossilrepos/resume.fossil ssh abiliojr@raspberry1 fossil version -v The permissions are really more for curiousity since if they were wrong you would get more errors than just cloning authorization. I know you already provided an interactive fossil version output, but I want to see if there is a difference for non-interactive. Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000053ef9722 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
