On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> My pleasure - i'm loving it already (in a chat-coding session) and should >> have done it months ago. >> > > "chat-coding session" reminds me that an old, long out of production, IDE > had a collaborative editing feature. >
GChat is a newer one ;) https://plus.google.com/104981852298046595282/posts/8TVedyAWkpm > Unfortunately, the original publisher chose to not offer a collaboration > server for the IDE, but instead just said "works with any IRC server". > IIRC (maybe not) intelliJ has a similar feature. > While many of my clients did use that IDE (and a few still do), IRC was a > "never going to do that here" thing. Now days, most of my clients use Cisco > Jabber. But it's configured to only allow access via the Cisco Jabber > Client, so even if there were an XMPP based collaborative editing feature > in any IDE, there would still be hard to put it into actual use. (And there > would still be the "I'm not going to pay an engineer to watch another > engineer type" factor to get around) > i have not ever collaboratively coded, but would love to try. i enjoy editing docs in collab with others in GDocs. That said, VNC/X11/RDP would suffice for my old-fashioned coding environment (emacs/shell/make). The only things i use IDEs for nowadays are Java (IDE necessary!) and JS (because emacs can't indent it worth a darn ;). But a collaborative editor - i'd try that. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
