Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:37:03 +0200:

> What version does one  hope to get from the remote  over HTTP? You can
> only tell what versions he's copied/pulled  (in that it will be at the
> top of  the RSS feed/timeline),  but that  doesn't mean he's  got that
> version checked out or installed.

I  think  /timeline.rss?tag=release&n=<somelargenumber>   (or  a  custom
report  as Ron  suggested)  will  be able  to  provide this  information
(unless Fossil is installed), but otherwise,  I don't see how he can get
it.

> > But for auto-updates I need some  other way, that to check for newer
> > versions than the version on  the user's machine. Another problem is
> > than only the versions tagged as "release" have to be check.
>
> sounds _very_ much like the "quiet  update" thread from a couple weeks
> back, in  that the functionality  would basically be the  same: figure
> out if there's a newer version or not (i.e. if there's work to be done
> or not).

It does  sound very  similar with  the exception that  there will  be no
local checkout of the repository. To be  able to determine if there is a
change that requires  auto-update, he will have to know  not only how to
get  information from  the  remote  Fossil, but  also  which version  is
currently installed (I assume he already knows this).

Thanks,

Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 40000000544689e3
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to