> Message: 7
> Date: 27 Oct 2014 09:50:39 -0600
> From: "Andy Bradford" <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>
> To: "Tony Papadimitriou" <to...@acm.org>
> Cc: Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL ALL
> Message-ID: <20141027095039.14517.qm...@angmar.bradfordfamily.org>
>
> Thus said "Tony Papadimitriou" on Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:18:04 +0200:
>
> > I guess the same scenario would be valid if one used a server but had
> > private branches. My understanding is that private branches do not
> > sync so the only way to move to another location is to move the whole
> > fossil file. Correct?
>
> >From ``fossil help sync'':
>
> Use the --private option to sync private branches with the
> remote repository.
>
> Andy
> --
> TAI64 timestamp: 40000000544e69f0
>
>
FWIW, I work mostly on windows. I'm pretty confident I have never explicitly
used "file://". I just say
fossil clone U:/fossils/myfossil.fossil
And fossil does the rest to put things in. Same for "fossil remoteurl". I've
used both relative and absolute paths to the fossil repo. Fossil automatically
adds the file:// part as necessary.
The way Richard described it will (should) work.
As another FWIW, I have many repos on a network drive in '--wal' mode to share
between windows / linux sources and have yet to have a corruption issue after a
year and a half of not-so-frequent use.
Tomek
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
