On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> From what I've read regarding the fossil documentation, it seems that sha1
> hashes are used for the files. Is that still correct?
>

Yes


> If it is sha1, are there plans to switch to sha256?


I am not an authority on fossil roadmap, but I would guess that there is no
such plan. Why switch? the hashes are not used for security, but as a type
of checksum. The chance of two sha1 hashes colliding accidentally is
astronomical.


-- 
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to