On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From what I've read regarding the fossil documentation, it seems that sha1 > hashes are used for the files. Is that still correct? > Yes > If it is sha1, are there plans to switch to sha256? I am not an authority on fossil roadmap, but I would guess that there is no such plan. Why switch? the hashes are not used for security, but as a type of checksum. The chance of two sha1 hashes colliding accidentally is astronomical. -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users