On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:23:02PM +0200, Baruch Burstein wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Stephan Beal < > sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Actually... i use the flat view more often than not. That's > probably just historical momentum (and the way my old menus > are > all set up). i wouldn't whine about loss of flat view, but > also > won't argue for its removal. > > > flat mode meaning /dir instead of /tree. > > > Yes. And remember, I'm not going to make /dir go away - I'm just > wanting to take away its prominent links on the menu bar. The pages > will all still be there for those who want them. But links to those > pages won't clutter the screen for people who do not. > > > Another thought about tree/flat view. Maybe the default for large (by some > definition of large) repos should be flat mode. I just tried loading > http:/ > /netbsd.sonnenberger.org/tree?ci=tip and took over 2 minutes! > > > I just tested it with the latest fossil trunk (that server is using a version > almost a year old). While the page on the current server is 12+MB, the same > page, if they were to update the fossil version, is 29+MB! I definitely think > that there should at least be an option to make flat view the default.
What browser are you using ? I don't know why, but I have a local repo with ~175000 files and it take like 4.5 seconds to load in Firefox 34, but almost 30 seconds in Google Chrome 39. (Linux debian 7 64bits) >From firefox Network benchmark, my page is 5.5MB. (not sure if that is compressed or not) -- Martin G. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
