On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why was this never merged into trunk? Is it still awaiting more > development, or was it deemed unsuitable for standard fossil, or was it > just forgotten? > > It needs work before it goes into trunk. Some of the features are very nice. Others need to be rethought (they do not work in all cases). I had intended to work on that but have been distracted by other things. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
