Stephan Beal <sgbeal-gM/ye1e23mwn+bqq9rb...@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Can you show us what your directory structure looks like now? i think i > understand what you are doing, but want to be sure before suggesting > anything you might regret ;). Sure, but I probably need a word of explanation first. The directory hierarchy I'm working in is was to be the /projects directories and files from several divergent hosts that have been rsync'ed onto a solaris host, Each host to have its own hierarchy, so there would be a lot of duplicaiton and near duplication that I'd like to clean up much as I can. The near dups will need to be merged some way. I'm still pondering that but the whole thing could still be in one fossil repo So far I've only gotten 4 of the hosts done. My small (read tiny) experimental repo only covered the perl projects from a single host. To give some idea of size: find /projects/2x/perl -type f|wc -l 124 find /projects/2x/perl -type d 16 So just 124 files in 16 directoreis under version control If I expand the repo like I've posted about it would grow a good bit but still probably fall into the tiny catetogry by many of the posters here standards. Expanded it would be 18,022 files in: 1,311 directories ------- ------- ---=--- ------- ------- I'll just post a tree view of directories only, for the bigger hierarchy. No, that would be a very long tree. I'll just post the hierarchies from 2 of the hosts one at a time .. that should give the idea. The second one. /projects/2x contains the hierarchy of my tiny experiment repo too /projects/2x/perl See them at (two files): http://zeus.jtan.com/~reader/vu1/disp.cgi _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
