Am Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:33:42 +0100
schrieb Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>:

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> 
> > Providing a date on the filename seems (to me) a lot more useful
> > than a random SHA1 hash.
> >
> 
> +1, if only because they retain their release order when sorted
> lexically.
> 


Maybe I didn't write that clear enough - with $version I meant the
actual version number, not a hash. For the current version 1.31 (as
listed in the downloads page), this would be:

        fossil-1.31.tar.gz


That's what I'd like to see, not the hash or date.


Regards, robotanarchy
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to