On 24 February 2015 at 16:50, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> So it seems like having dates on the download would be more meaningful
>>> than having a made-up version number.  No?  With a date, at least you
>>> know about how old the code is.  What information does a made-up
>>> version number provide?  How is that better than a date?
>>
>>
>> FWIW, that's the approach i've taken for all but one of my own projects
>> the past 15 years. Version numbers, _unless_ they are accompanied by a
>> strict set of compatibility rules involving API- and/or binary
>> compatibility, are _absolutely meaningless_.
>
>
> For the SW I work on, the version number has a well defined set of features
> and fixes. A number rather than a date/time because that's easier for the
> project managers to keep track of in their spreadsheets (they associate
> dates with deadlines, so version numbers remove a source of panic). Also,
> remove a source of confusion: "I thought I just built the software in this
> module, but the date in it is from last week."
>
> (We do, however, have "internal" version numbers on certain data structures,
> such as calibration data. This insures that, for example, a given
> calibration file is compatible with the SW in the module. When the structure
> is changed, the version number gets incremented. This allows us to not have
> to regenerate calibration files for every SW release.)
>

For my day job, version numbers in ANY capacity are out of the
equation (NOT my choice). The project in question either in trunk/head
or its in some branch. It pretty much means filing bug reports are
useless since we can't really identify when an issue first occurred.
I'd be happy for a version number, svn rev number, or a date in my
work's product. Too bad it's not my decision to change this, although
I've filed a bug report to have it included. ;)


-- 
-------
inum: 883510009027723
sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info
xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to