Hi Peter, On 25 February 2015 at 04:49, Peter Spjuth <peter.spj...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ?VERSION? led me to believe I could get info about older > revisions this way. After some problems I resorted to source-diving > and it seem that fossil ls is purely about the current checkout, > and there is no version in its arguments. > > Have I interpreted this correctly? > I even found when the confusing string was introduced: > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/9ba8a393fcc569b2
Have you tested with that available download, one the one just before that to see what fossil ls does then compared to what it does with current? -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
