checkins reminds me of chickens, for what it's worth. If we at least standardize on one, a global search/replace to update them becomes much more possible.
-bch On 2/26/15, jungle Boogie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brad, > On 26 February 2015 at 09:57, bch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could you supply these as a diff? Anybody with a local copy can edit >> the files in question and, if not commit-and-publish (because of >> permissions), supply a standard, machine handlable format, versus an >> ad hoc, error-prone, and (I suspect) time-consuming-to-produce format. >> >> Thanks for reviewing all this and identifying problems!!! > > Yes, I can supply a diff. It will take a few hours but I'd rather do > it correctly. > > Do we want to always use check-in or checkin? The former is more > common but the timeline page lists 'checkins'. > > These are corrections of spelling mistakes and after all these are > corrected, I'll review possible double words and grammar issues. > > Best, > jungle > > > -- > ------- > inum: 883510009027723 > sip: [email protected] > xmpp: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
