You could always have a global setting on how to deal with this (old way vs
new way) to keep everyone happy :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Hipp
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:22 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm
On 3/3/15, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
Is there a good reason that “fossil mv” and “fossil rm” must be followed
by
OS-level mv and rm commands? I miss the behavior of Subversion which made
these into a single step.
When I have suggested changing this, I got push back that the change
will break existing scripts.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
