On 06/03/15 15:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote: [---] > "fossil rename" already exists as alias to "fossil mv", so I > suggest to add "fossil forget" as alias to "fossil rm". Then > later the behavior of fossil rm/mv" can be modified, while > forget/rename will continue to behave as rm/mv do now. > > Any objections against adding "fossil forget" as alias > to "fossil rm" ???? If not, I'll be glad to add it, awaiting > further discussion.
No objection. I'm even going to go so far as to say I'll be cheering you on. /Jan _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
