Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> writes: > a git fork can be pulled (via a "pull request") into the original just like > merging a branch, so the the effect is similar (not identical).
These days most of the FOSS is hosted at github and for someone wanting to contribute to usual scenario is: 1) clone original repo 2) create feature/fix branch locally 3) hack and rebase fix/feature on original's master 4) submit PR 5) fix/feature is reviewed 6) if the fix/feature needs more work go to 3) 7) fix/feature is merged in master Now, if someone wants to maximize usage of Fossil and minimize usage of Git, what can be improved in Fossil in regard or what is the recommended workflow to be practiced? Sincerely, Gour -- Everyone is forced to act helplessly according to the qualities he has acquired from the modes of material nature; therefore no one can refrain from doing something, not even for a moment. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
