> This may be related to the scaling issue, see the discussion started by > Richard Hipp, entitled "Fossil 2.1: Scaling".
Some great ideas by Richard and very useful feature for large repositories (like Matt and Andy have). Though I think his intended goals are slightly different than what I was envisioning with "cheap clone". But I don't see why I can't build on top of that. Anyway it's too early to say anything concrete as release 2.1 is in far future. > I have been thinking about a project/service similar to Lagerstatte. My > prototype is based on the MEAN stack and is named "ammonite" but the dev > is on stand-by. Is the project FOSS? I'd like to see the implementation. :-) > IMHO what would be a strong selling point would be to > have a decentralized and distributed architecture. Think Diaspora* > (https://joindiaspora.com/) but for developers. Nice idea but requires a bit more definition. Top priority atm is to get Lagerstätte in a "usable" state as a front-end to Fossil repositories. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users