On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> What if the fork is intentially left unhandled? This means that all > parties will be alerted to the fact that there exists a fork because it > was intentionally left a fork. Is this acceptable? Will this be > confusing for anonymous or other users of a given repository when the > developers intentionally leave a fork and they get a warning about it > the next time they sync? > Off hand, the only reason I can think for intentionally leaving the fork a fork would be so the warning continues to be displayed. Otherwise, I would expect the devs to give it a proper, new branch name. I don't think this is something we can do anything about.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
