On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Zoltán Kócsi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is your intent to co-mingle same-named branches? I.e. if there is a > > trunk in both source repos do you wish to merge both dev streams to a > > single trunk? > > Yes. Basically, it's two source repos of two embedded gizmos. They are > interrelated and share a couple of headers (protocol message formats, > mainly) but otherwise development-wise independent. However, bugs can > affect both so a common bug database and of course a common place of > shared headers is in order. Another option would be put the common files in a third repo and do the issue tracking there, too. (Fossil supports "nested" check outs, so a dev can check out the new (3rd) repo to the appropriate sub directory of a check out one of the original projects.)
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
