On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:02 PM, David Mason <dma...@ryerson.ca> wrote:
> But it's a reasonable way to remove binaries that you don't want. > Indeed - my point was only that shunning as a feature is _primarily_ intended as a way to remove sensitive or malicious stuff. > Just be careful not to shun 0 length files or you won't be able to > commit a 0-length file until you've cleared the shun table (because all > 0-length files have the same SHA-1 id. > > Excellent point, though it's hard to imagine such files being either binary or holding sensitive data (except maybe in their name... hmmm.... interesting corner case). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
