[ conversation about appearance of "permuted index" page from a while ago ]
>On 22 June 2015 at 20:11, Ross Berteig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 6/22/2015 10:46 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> I agree we all think differently, but the output should collate the >>> descriptions while keeping only a single common link. >>> The difference with the wiki 'keyword in context' is I can see the >>> duplication. The auto doc page infers many unique links. >> >> The whole point of a permuted index is to provide an alphabetical list of >> keywords, shown along with some context, and references (links) to where >> they appear. >> ... > >ok, I tried to do this earlier with a bit of effort, but my TCL-foo is too >weak: > >how about displaying the permuted index (if that must be - I don't see >the whole point of it, since there is a browser 'search' function >anyway, but hey :-), but display canonical links in bold. The section >header could then be something like "Permuted index", "(canonical >titles displayed in bold)". > >Is that an idea? my Tcl-foo is less weak now, and the "canonical titles in bold" was tried in [2a8dd751] (http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/2a8dd751/www/permutedindex.html for an impression). After feedback that the canonical titles stick out too much now, a separate list of canonical titles was tried in [66920879] (http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/66920879/www/permutedindex.html for an impression - canonical titles follow the original permited index). Another suggestion was to move the list of canonical titles in front of the original permuted index - which sounds perfect to me. Is this something you like? Feedback is welcome. Michai _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
