On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Committing without first checking whether the commit was _semantically_ > successful is _just plain wrong_. git does it that way, but that is a huge > flaw in its thinking (IMHO). A successful merge only means that the SCM was > capable of merging changes without _apparent_ errors (meaning only "no > overlapping changes"), but the developer must first compile/test the changes > before committing it to ensure that the merge is semantically correct. >
Correct! Shame on me. Thanks. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
