On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:12 PM, j. van den hoff <
> veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> in a breach of promise to myself to never again argue in favour of this
>> functionality on the fossil mailing list (it came up a few times over the
>> last years):
>
> If I understand correctly, the way fossil is designed could cause the
> numbers to change *even locally* upon a rebuild, or even just a sync. This
> would probably get confusing.
>

Correct. And if i'm not mistaken, if you rebuild with the --randomize
option then the order could get even weirder.

(@Joerg: i was trying to remember who it was who used to ask for this
feature ;)

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
"Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to