On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:12 PM, j. van den hoff < > veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> in a breach of promise to myself to never again argue in favour of this >> functionality on the fossil mailing list (it came up a few times over the >> last years): > > If I understand correctly, the way fossil is designed could cause the > numbers to change *even locally* upon a rebuild, or even just a sync. This > would probably get confusing. > Correct. And if i'm not mistaken, if you rebuild with the --randomize option then the order could get even weirder. (@Joerg: i was trying to remember who it was who used to ask for this feature ;) -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users