On 10/6/15, Tony Papadimitriou <[email protected]> wrote: > When restoring a previous version of a single file, is there any practical > difference between the following two actions: > > fossil up version file > fossil rev -r version file > > I have been using the UPDATE method up to now. But, I ran into the other > possibility in the docs and I wonder when each should be used, or do they > always have exactly the same effect? >
I believe that UPDATE will attempt to merge in local edits, whereas REVERT will overwrite your edits and make the file exactly equal to what was in the -r check-in. -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
