On 11/2/15, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > when you > want to separate the changes you want to commit and changes you want > to ... keep uncommitted to do more work on them this is quite > useful. And don't tell me nobody ever mixes unrelated and possibly > conflicting changes in the same working directory.
People do that. But it is much more easily accomplished by simply listing the files you want to commit on the "commit" command line. That's what every other VCS in the world other than Git does. And it works great. And it does not require the added confusion of a staging area. But on the other hand, you should not be checking-in untested changes. The proper way to do incremental check-ins is to stash the whole lot, then pull out individual pieces from the stash and test and commit them separately. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
