On Mon, 16 May 2016 23:06:59 -0500, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/16/2016 1:17 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > He said he thinks he'll go with Git instead because that would give the > > engineers working under him more forward mobility when they eventually > > move on to other companies, whereas Fossil is unknown and would not > > improve their employability. > > > > [...] > > > > Of course, none of that matters since he started by prioritizing marketing. > > I had a thought about Git marketing versus Fossil marketing. > > Git's success, at least its initial adoption from which critical mass > formed, is due to it being written by the principal author of Linux for > managing the development of Linux. > > Sound familiar?
Calling the developers of another revision control system "ugly and stupid" in a roomful of Google developers probably helped. :) ---- Thank you, Arnel _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
