On 8/13/16, Kain Abel <[email protected]> wrote: > > after > $ fossil stash pop > or > $ fossil stash rm > is the pointer for the next stash id (stash-next in table vvar) untouched.
And thus each new stash has a unique id. Is that a problem? -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
