On 10/4/2016 12:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:15:58 -0400:
Does anybody know of a reasonable work-around?
What  do other  VCS do?  Presumably  CVS, SVN,  Hg, Git,  etc. have  all
Wsupported indows for a long time. Do they just return a sensible error?

When we still used CVS around here, my recollection is that it simply failed spectacularly due to a lack of testing returns from system calls that "cannot fail". It wasn't the only problem we had with CVS. We switched to fossil for lots of reasons, but at the time all of the other choices seemed to be run by people with an attitude problem about Windows.

This is one of those bugaboos that is mostly ignored by the tools, and that answer usually just works since eventually developers learn that they can't use those names.

IMHO, using namespace tricks to create the files or folders with reserved names will only result in additional mysterious failures and pain for Windows users. No build systems or compilers will be using those tricks, and even deleting the files later becomes a problem for the user.

The best action would be to make sure that the failure to write the file on a particular system gets a clear error message so the user knows who to blame, and doesn't blame fossil.

A possible work-around would be to transform the name from a reserved name to a working (but unexpected) name. Fossil would need to have a setting to control that, and likely should provide configuration of what transformation is done. We already do something sort of like that for symbolic links, so there is that precedent. Just adding a tilde to the basename would be enough to allow the checkout. The project's build system or other automation would still be broken, of course.

(A single setting could be added. If missing, fossil acts as it does now. If present, files that can't be opened are modified by appending the content of the setting to their basename. No idea what happens if you change that setting with a checkout open. It probably should be versionable. The mapping would need to apply to all of fossil's operations on that file or folder. This is beginning to sound like an iceberg-like feature. One setting implies 100s of lines of code.)

Beyond that, the list of disallowed names is probably stable enough that a warning on checkin could be made. But I strongly suspect the usual response to that warning by a *nix user will be "#$*!@ Windows, I just want to check in and go home" and the bad names will lurk until the project gets ported.

I vaguely recall hearing that there was a major open source project that had a folder named aux that was bit by this issue, and IIRC they ultimately resolved it by renaming the folder to something that worked on all platforms. I'm not recalling what project that was, though.

--
Ross Berteig                               r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp.           http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to