On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Adam Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 03:39 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > I would call that a wiki, not only inside fossil-scm but in general. > > I am inclined to think that a wiki probably isn't sufficient for many > projects. What I am casually proposing (just brainstorming, really) is a > documentation framework that supports several different types of user > (annotation) and developer (modification) involvement, all regulated by > policy automation and human/system assessment, modeling and analysis. > Sounds like something Google Docs does or could easily do (at least in Google docs for Business).
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
