On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Martin Vahi <[email protected]> wrote: > It is about 4.4GiB, over 100k files, over 6k folders, > but it should not be that bad. After all, that's what > many projects look like in 2016.
This statement is IMHO a bit unfair. You basically grab *4* subversions trees (if I count well) and you smash that to one big tree and commit into fossil repo. So if you expect speed of svn, then please compare fairly independent subversion trees with independent fossil trees. Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which does that for you transparently and you do not need to do that on the fossil side. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
