On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:22:43PM -0500, Ron W wrote: > > I only use git when I have to, generally when a project requires submitting > pull requests. In that case, I still track my local changes in Fossil. Then > I pull the latest into my clone of the git repo, merge the changes into my > work space, rebuild, retest abd repeat as needed. Then I commit the "final" > changes to my clone and send the pull request.
That sounds like a use case for what I've built, plus functionality going the other way (Git->Fossil), which I haven't built (yet). Of course, all this stuff is handled by export and import commands for both Fossil and Git, but I built something to mirror Fossil repositories to Git repositories so I could simplify my life somewhat when doing that. > > At work, the controls software group uses Fossil "internally", but the > company is still "standardized" on SVN (because the IT group's vision is > for "thin client" PCs that are fully interchangeable, which doesn't work > for my group because we need specialized tool chains that don't "play well" > with IT's vision). We use Fossil for our day-to-day work, only committing > releases to SVN. It seems like you have need of tools for import/export mirroring with Subversion, too. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
