> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads > On 2/20/17, Emil Totev <em...@tot-consult.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> There are still inconsistencies in the binary downloads for linux at >> fossil's web site. >> >> File fossil-linux-x86-1.37.tar.gz contains a x64 (64-bit) executable. >> There seems to be no 32-bit linux executable download. >> >> Could someone please fix that for this and future builds? > > I suspect that the Mac and OpenBSD builds are 64-bits too. I suppose > we could produce 32-bit binaries, but I worry that they would be > largely untested, since I use 64-bit machines almost exclusively, as I > suspect most of the other Fossil developers do as well. If you really > need a 32-bit binary, you can always build your own use the source > tarball, right? > > Or, perhaps you are simply asking that the downloads be relabeled from > "x86" to "x64"? >
Well, at least relabeling the downloads (and renaming the files itself) in order to avoid confusion would be nice. I guess I could build my own binary, of course, but I've always felt more comfortable using 'official' binaries. And 32-bit Linux is far from being an exotic platform even these days. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
