Thanks Richard and Jan. I'll roll with trunk, then.
Cheers,
Philip
On 3/17/2017 4:30 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
2017-03-17 16:08 GMT+01:00 Philip Bennefall:
I am about to build Fossil with Openssl support, and I am wondering what
check-in to use? Should I use the latest commit that is tagged "release" on
trunk, or should I use the tip of "branch-2.1" which seems to have some
later bugfixes? I don't rebuild Fossil often so am looking for as stable a
version as possible.
If you want to build with OpenSSL-1.1.0, then I definitely would build
with either "trunk" or the tip of "branch-2.1", because of the
following bug-fix from Debian:
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847556#10>
If you are using Openssl-1.0.2, then this doesn't matter, whatever
version is fine.
My recommendation would be, just take the top of the "trunk"
(as Richard recommended too), it's as stable as it can be ;-)
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
